{"id":4716,"date":"2015-05-18T17:17:00","date_gmt":"2015-05-18T21:17:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/?p=4716"},"modified":"2015-05-18T17:17:00","modified_gmt":"2015-05-18T21:17:00","slug":"anc-2b-passes-1772-church-st-resolution-may-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/2015\/05\/18\/anc-2b-passes-1772-church-st-resolution-may-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"ANC 2B passes 1772 Church St. Resolution May 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Wednesday May 13, 2015, ANC 2B passed the below Resolution by a vote of 7-0 regarding the development project\u00a0at 1772 Church Street, NW (the “Project”). Two amendments to the Resolution, presented by\u00a0Commissioner Maltz, were passed\u00a0by the ANC. The amendments were based on language that CAS Riegler, the Project developer, submitted to select commissioners* prior to or during the meeting. \u00a0A copy of this language (the “CAS Riegler Amendment Language”)\u00a0is available HERE<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Commission will forward\u00a0a\u00a0letter containing this below resolution to the Historic Preservation Review Board.\u00a0HPRB will review the project on June 4th (the May 2015 overflow date).<\/p>\n

* The author of this post, ANC 2B07 Commissioner Justine Underhill,\u00a0was notified of the existence and content of\u00a0the CAS Riegler Amendment Language only after the termination of the May 13, 2015 meeting.<\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

1772 Church St HPRB May 2015<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

WHEREAS the development at 1772 Church Street NW has been reviewed by Advisory Neighborhood Commission 2B (ANC 2B) and the Historic Preservation Review Board multiple times; and<\/p>\n

WHEREAS during the last project iteration, the Historic Preservation Review Board requested the applicant address ANC 2B\u2019s resolution passed without opposition at the March 11, 2015 ANC 2B meeting, which is attached for your convenience; and<\/p>\n

WHEREAS the ANC 2B resolution specified several conditions to ensure compatibility of the project with the historic neighborhood; and<\/p>\n

WHEREAS while most stipulations were met, ANC 2B believes the following two stipulations were not met:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe residential building seen from adjacent at-grade vantage points including the entirety of Church Street, P Street, 18th Street, and the public alley between Church and P Streets be between 40 and 59 feet tall, including mechanicals, and maintain existing setbacks.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cAlterations are made to the exterior design so that the corrugation of the Church Street buildings\u2019 facades and the rhythm of the Church Street buildings\u2019 roof lines are in scale with the surrounding buildings.\u201d; and<\/p>\n

WHEREAS ANC 2B believes the residential component of the project as presented does not satisfy the height stipulation from many at grade vantage points on Church Street, 18th St, and in the public alley\u2014 including from the corner of 18th and P, Church Street from 17th Street to four rowhouses from the parish hall, and from the 17th Street vantage point in the alley.<\/p>\n

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED ANC 2B finds the proposal not in compliance with the March 2015 ANC 2B resolution; ANC 2B recommends the Historic Preservation Review Board require changes to the project massing and design that meet the conditions of the March resolution in their entirety.<\/p>\n

Be it further RESOLVED that to fit the rhythm of the surrounding context, ANC 2B believes the bays on the residential component, which abut the property line, should be set back such that they are in line the Church Street buildings\u2019 facades.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Wednesday May 13, 2015, ANC 2B passed the below Resolution by a vote of 7-0 regarding the development project\u00a0at 1772 Church Street, NW (the “Project”). Two amendments to the Resolution, presented by\u00a0Commissioner Maltz, were passed\u00a0by the ANC. The amendments were based on language that CAS Riegler, the Project developer, submitted to select commissioners* prior … Continue reading “ANC 2B passes 1772 Church St. Resolution May 2015”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,28,31,19],"tags":[71,68],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4716"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4716"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4716\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4723,"href":"https:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4716\/revisions\/4723"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4716"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4716"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dupontcircleanc.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}